voidq.xyz is a Fediverse instance that uses the ActivityPub protocol. In other words, users at this host can communicate with people that use software like Mastodon, Pleroma, Friendica, etc. all around the world.
This server runs the snac software and there is no automatic sign-up process.
I have to preface this to say that it's not my main OS, so I have limited time with it. For example here's my total usage per OS per year:
2023:
Linux: 49 d, 14 h, 57 min
2024:
Linux: 191 d, 18 h, 55 min
OpenBSD: 4 d, 7 h, 59 min
2025:
Linux: 175 d, 1 h, 41 min
FreeBSD: 23 d, 17 h, 54 min
OpenBSD: 3 d, 8 h, 19 min
(actually most of the time labeled "FreeBSD" for 2025 was actually Linux. I only converted that one box to #FreeBSD in November)
That said, notwithstanding how "primitive" #OpenBSD's FFS is, I have yet to lose any data with it, even taking into account a basically ornamental battery 😆 and occasional kernel crashes from me mucking about with buggy sysctls.
All that to say, I wouldn't doubt that ext4 is actually more robust than btrfs, even though it's more "basic."
The CfP is closed for the European *BSD event of 2026! 😈⛳🐡
Thank you all for your submissions!!
The schedule will be published on (around) 🗓️ 2026-07-15
For more information take a peek at https://2026.eurobsdcon.org/
More information is added all the time.
EuroBSDCon 2026 in Brussels, Belgium 🇧🇪
September 09-13, 2026
#RUNBSD #FreeBSD #NetBSD #OpenBSD #EuroBSDCon #EuroBSDCon2026 #BSD
mpls_do_error copies (nstk+1) label-stack entries from a fixed 16-entry array when no BoS label is present, leaking 4 bytes of adjacent kernel stack memory in the ICMP/MPLS error response.
We are about to close the CfP for
the European *BSD event of 2026! 😈⛳🐡
Planning to submit a talk? Now is the time!
Especially first time speakers and talk submissions for #NetBSD and #OpenBSD!
https://events.eurobsdcon.org/
The schedule will be published on 🗓️ 2026-07-15
For everything else, peek at https://2026.eurobsdcon.org/
More information is added all the time.
EuroBSDCon 2026 in Brussels, Belgium 🇧🇪
September 09-13, 2026
#RUNBSD #FreeBSD #NetBSD #OpenBSD #EuroBSDCon #EuroBSDCon2026 #BSD #CFP #Conference #Register
There doesn't seem to be an #OpenBSD pkg or port for that, unless I'm somehow getting the name wrong.
I love #OpenBSD (and all the BSDs, heck all the #FOSS OSes, they're all amazing), but y'all, this is a bit sad:
$ time pkg_info -Q nim
animorph-0.3p5
minimodem-0.24p0
nim-2.2.8 (installed)
openimageio-3.1.9.0p0
p5-Bit-Vector-Minimal-1.3p2
p5-Net-IP-Minimal-0.06p1
p5-Term-Animation-2.6p1
py3-minimalmodbus-2.1.1p2
py3-minimock-1.2.8p13
racket-minimal-9.1
texlive_texmf-minimal-2025p0
xanim-2.80.1p9
real 1m3.110s
user 0m1.360s
sys 0m0.120s
I know about pkg_locate, and I use it by default, honestly, but "that's not in base!" ;)
My network speed is a bit slow, but not that slow.
$ speedtest-cli
Retrieving speedtest.net configuration...
Testing from T-Mobile USA...
Retrieving speedtest.net server list...
Selecting best server based on ping...
Hosted by Frontier (Dallas, TX) [2449.63 km]: 28.121 ms
Testing download speed................................................................................
Download: 12.64 Mbit/s
Testing upload speed......................................................................................................
Upload: 6.27 Mbit/s
What has (can) the EU Cyber Resilience Act done (do) for you?
https://nxdomain.no/~peter/what_hascan_eu_cra_donedo_for_you.html
TL;DR: It's *not* the end of Free and Open Source software (or the world as we know it). It's time to engineer up!
#CRA #cyberresilience #resilience #cybersecurity #eu #freebsd #openbsd #netbsd #engineerup #development #softwareenginering
What has (can) the EU Cyber Resilience Act done (do) for you?
also at https://bsdly.blogspot.com/2026/06/what-has-can-eu-cyber-resilience-act.html (with trackers)
TL;DR: It's *not* the end of Free and Open Source software (or the world as we know it). It's time to engineer up!
#CRA #cyberresilience #resilience #cybersecurity #eu #freebsd #openbsd #netbsd #engineerup #development #softwareenginering
Hrm, first real problem with #OpenBSD 7.9: the igc driver seems to hang the output under load :(
I have output errors each time the load goes up which eventually clear.
igc0 at pci1 dev 0 function 0 "Intel I226-V" rev 0x04, msix, 4 queues, address 64:62:66:xx:ww:zz
it is a 4-port box so up to igc3.
The PHY is 2.5G and I noticed it is worse when connected to a 1G switch whereas it is minimal when connected to a 2.5G-capable (10G) switch.
Could this be 64-bit DMA being enabled in 7.9?
Port knocking is mostly a bad idea. But people keep wanting to do it, for some false sense of security. If you don’t consider it a security control but a way to keep garbage out of your logs, it might be valid. In my case I’m using an old USG Pro 4 running OpenBSD as my firewall and I’d prefer to avoid writing stuff to the logs, as I’d prefer the flash not to wear out sooner than needed, definitely not thanks to background radiation on the internet.
SSH port knocking with OpenBSD 7.9 https://lobste.rs/s/svhzaa #openbsd
https://dgl.cx/2026/06/ssh-port-knocking-with-openbsd
Arch has #OpenBSD #nc twice in the AUR. One package applies all of the Debian patches. One does not.
But they won't have noticed this difference, since they added these to the AUR around the time that Debian stopped patching the if test.
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/openbsd-netcat-tls
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/openbsd-netcat-git
#NetBSD, #FreeBSD, and #DragonFlyBSD all use the Jackson netcat.c with the if statement as in the original, so their ncs will all do this too.
Silly question of the #NetBSD folk… I know some of the BSD kernels (notably #FreeBSD, and once upon a time, #OpenBSD) were capable of Linux syscall emulation, meaning they could run Linux applications.
Is this still the case, and if so, does it extend to containerisation like #Docker? Platforms of interest would be `x86-64` and `aarch64`.
https://kb.shells.com/tutorials/NetBSD/Docker/ seems to suggest it was at least at one point, a thing, but the link to the Docker download site is a 404.
OpenBSD’s sppp_pap_input function used attacker-controlled length fields as the bcmp comparison length for credential validation. Sending zero-length name and password fields caused bcmp to return 0 unconditionally, bypassing PAP authentication entirely. The vulnerability was introduced in 1999 and survived for 27 years before being fixed.